 |
| MNSCJUSTICELORIGILDACHIEF |
June 16 at 4:14 PM
WHAT LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS DON’T TELL YOU
This is kept secret by the profession. First off, the court system today, including the clerk of courts, are not judicial but administrative pursuant to TEXAS Statutes and 5 U.S.C. the Administrative Procedure Act (federal & state) since they are not article III or constitutional courts, they are administrative courts that fall under the executive branch and under the Administrative Procedure Acts.
Secondly, why would anyone in their right mind even hire an attorney? The court and its officers can only interact with either a corporation, trust or "ward of the court" (except in a court of record in a common law venue which is a superior court) and cannot interact with a live human "people". Under Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), (means “body of law”)
Volume 7, Section 4 - Attorney & client: The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter."
Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys. See the lawyer's code of ethics; see 7 CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM at section 4 which reads:
"7 C.J.S. Section 4. Nature and Duties of Office. An attorney is an officer of the court with an obligation to the courts and the public as well as to his clients, and his duty is to facilitate the administration of justice. An attorney does not hold an office or public trust, in the constitutional or statutory sense of that term, and strictly speaking, he is not an officer of the state or of a governmental subdivision thereof. Rather, as held in many decisions, he is an officer of the court, before which he has been admitted to practice. An attorney is not the court or one of its ministerial officers, or a law enforcement officer. He is, however, in a sense an officer of the state, with an obligation to the courts and to the public no less significant than his obligation to his clients. Thus, an attorney occupies a "dual position" which imposes "dual obligations."
His first duty is to the courts and the public, NOT to the client, and wherever the duties his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. 1950 the 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and ran by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.
We now know why on the 9th December in 1945 the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. In 8 U.S.C. §1481 stated that once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus any state employee becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e., every single court is considered a separate foreign entity.) Under 22 U.S.C. (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.
Any state agency that operates "For Profit" is not dejure but defacto and void of immunity thus operating like any other publicly trading corporation as declared by the U.S. supreme Court - Clearfield Trust v. U.S., 318 US 363 - 1943.
You become a "ward of the court" when you hire or request a lawyer or attorney. Look up ward of the court in Black's Law Dictionary. You are telling everyone that you are a "person of unsound mind" and need the court to "take care of you", oh they'll take care of you all right.
, May 12, 2019, 05:01:44 PM CDTSubject: Law of Reason ;)
Common Law and the Law of Reason | Natural Law, Natural ...
www.nlnrac.org/ earlymodern/ common-lawIn discussing common law in relation to natural law, more has been said about common- law process than about substantive rules of law, many of which—for example, the law of coverture in marriage, or various tenures for the holding of real property—have been radically changed, often by legislation.
Common Law and the Law of Reason | Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Amer...
Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means-to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal-would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face. US vs Olmstead
A We the People project of the National Endowment for the Humanities
2019 The Witherspoon Institute Copyright © All Rights Reserved.
WHAT LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS DON’T TELL YOU
This is kept secret by the profession. First off, the court system today, including the clerk of courts, are not judicial but administrative pursuant to TEXAS Statutes and 5 U.S.C. the Administrative Procedure Act (federal & state) since they are not article III or constitutional courts, they are administrative courts that fall under the executive branch and under the Administrative Procedure Acts.
Secondly, why would anyone in their right mind even hire an attorney? The court and its officers can only interact with either a corporation, trust or "ward of the court" (except in a court of record in a common law venue which is a superior court) and cannot interact with a live human "people". Under Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), (means “body of law”)
Volume 7, Section 4 - Attorney & client: The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter."
Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys. See the lawyer's code of ethics; see 7 CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM at section 4 which reads:
"7 C.J.S. Section 4. Nature and Duties of Office. An attorney is an officer of the court with an obligation to the courts and the public as well as to his clients, and his duty is to facilitate the administration of justice. An attorney does not hold an office or public trust, in the constitutional or statutory sense of that term, and strictly speaking, he is not an officer of the state or of a governmental subdivision thereof. Rather, as held in many decisions, he is an officer of the court, before which he has been admitted to practice. An attorney is not the court or one of its ministerial officers, or a law enforcement officer. He is, however, in a sense an officer of the state, with an obligation to the courts and to the public no less significant than his obligation to his clients. Thus, an attorney occupies a "dual position" which imposes "dual obligations."
His first duty is to the courts and the public, NOT to the client, and wherever the duties his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. 1950 the 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and ran by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.
We now know why on the 9th December in 1945 the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. In 8 U.S.C. §1481 stated that once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus any state employee becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e., every single court is considered a separate foreign entity.) Under 22 U.S.C. (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.
Any state agency that operates "For Profit" is not dejure but defacto and void of immunity thus operating like any other publicly trading corporation as declared by the U.S. supreme Court - Clearfield Trust v. U.S., 318 US 363 - 1943.
You become a "ward of the court" when you hire or request a lawyer or attorney. Look up ward of the court in Black's Law Dictionary. You are telling everyone that you are a "person of unsound mind" and need the court to "take care of you", oh they'll take care of you all right.
, May 12, 2019, 05:01:44 PM CDTSubject: Law of Reason ;)
Common Law and the Law of Reason | Natural Law, Natural ...
www.nlnrac.org/ earlymodern/ common-lawIn discussing common law in relation to natural law, more has been said about common- law process than about substantive rules of law, many of which—for example, the law of coverture in marriage, or various tenures for the holding of real property—have been radically changed, often by legislation.
Common Law and the Law of Reason | Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Amer...
Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means-to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal-would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face. US vs Olmstead
